- Jan 2, 2018
- 4,207
- 24,930
Number of scenes doesn't matter. it is generally the scenes themselves that result in the ban rather then the amount. Also I don't get why everyone brings up consistency like it is a problem. Rule 7 is decided by vote. The act of voting is bound to be inconsistent by the nature of process itself. Everyone has their own opinions and biases. The staff voting roster is not consistent either. Staff members come and go. Any change in the line-up and now you got a totally different roster of people making a decision. You can't truly compare decison made a year ago to decision made now. Also reviewing games every time a new person comes or leaves is totally not possible.Bro I literally couldnt care less about the gender debate or any other shit like that
For me those things are for people who have too much free time on their hands
What pisses me off about rule 7 is that some games never got a proper thread despite having minimal amounts of shota content
The Scarlet demonslayer published by kagura is a prime example: only 3 shota scenes in the whole game (which were well hidden btw) got the game banned.
My problem regarding rule 7 doesnt lie on the gender but on consistency
That is just how it is unfortunately. Even with a clearly defined rule each person is going to have their own viewpoint. Keep in mind it only takes one vote to save or damn a game. It also takes one person choosing to vote or not to change the outcome. I am not trying to single you out or argue about rule 7, just wanted to provide some clarity on the process that I don't think is mentioned enough personally. I just see these comments a lot quoting consisterncy being a problem, but personally that is a side effect of the process for better or worse. At least that is how I feel. You are welcome to disagree. The alternatives are either banning all or allowing all and that isn't going to make anyone happy and has it's own pros and cons. Rule 7 is a flawed, but necessary process.