Since your most predominant premise is exceedingly wrong, all the other implications you made around it are also far away from reality.
I'm curious what my supposed "predominant premise" was, since it was based on information that I was about to gather from what two other users presented based on the content in your game. My "predominant premise" is speculative inquiry about your perception of persons with disabilities, based upon how you have chosen to present them in your game.
And the answer to your question is no. I don't believe in any of these declarations you made up about persons with disabilities at all.
Don't gaslight me, buddy. You're the one making the game, so whatever "declarations" aka QUALITIES of your MC that YOU have presented in YOUR game, then that's not me declaring anything. You're the one making the game, not me. If you don't believe any of those qualities would apply to someone with a disability, why put it in your game as a trait of your main character who also happens to be disabled? Is the disability your interpretation of why someone would behave so abhorrently?
Please, refrain from attacking me this way in this forum. It is against the rules.
I am allowed to express criticism towards content and to question the morality of a content creator when I feel it is justified, such as now. Nothing about my criticism of your main character having a disability and also reducing women to sex objects is an attack. It's also not an attack if I question the thought process that goes into thinking it's acceptable to present a person with a disability as also incapable of self-correcting repugnant behaviour of their own accord, much less possessing that behaviour. Hell, a guy criticized a part of dialogue that reduced a black woman to a sex object, and your response was "lol I agree that political correctness sucks." The guy was criticizing your writing, as in he felt that that piece of dialogue was so offensive that it effectively killed any interest he had in supporting your game.
I'll say this: your optics are really bad. You made a game about a mentally disabled guy who has rapey behaviour, who reduces women to little more than sex toys for his amusement, and then ask the player to effectively "correct" him via removing his autonomy. Your presentation is really terrible. Your idea is borderline harmful to persons with disabilities. This entire project feels like a plane entering a nosedive before it has even left the ground, and the pilot lacks all the self-awareness to realize five minutes of pilot school probably wasn't enough to jump into flying a commercial plane.
