I really regret that my discussion with
kaizoman was deleted, coz we disscussed all of that and came to understanding. So to sum it up for you:
1) It's a parody game, not a real rpg, so rpg elements here are afterthought, it's not the main point of the game and writing that parody game sucks because it's bad rpg is stupid.(For anyone who didn't see anime it's valid coz if they don't get the humor that's all that's left - the rpg that sucks).
2) It's called personal opinion if you didn't know that while writing your own. While playing it I felt that developer didn't put too much energy into many elements of the game(storytelling, bios of chars, battles and many more), so it's clearly aren't going to be another Roundscape Adorevia contentwise, as such I believe the demo shows all planned core mechanics of the finished game unless they'll redo it.
3) I think for the 1st version of a small parody game it's doing alright, the only part it truly lacks is hotness, hence 4 stars for now. Will it became better or worse in the future, who knows? For now it's alright.
4) Rating first version of the game in development for amount of content... Do I even need to write how it sounds?
i don't mind wasting space with you if you realy want to show how much your praise for the game are actualy the worse critic :S
1) it's not a parody of rpg, it's a "parody" of konosuba which use badly rpgm, i get that point, i've watched the anime, one of the movie and played a couple game (official, all public fan made and a couple h-paroy, so i like the humor in konosuba) the problem for me is that if he want to use konosuba in a rpg he should do it in a way that follow te story, not with seemingly similar but actualy completely different setting, right now, you change the name and visual and it can be any mainstream h-game, it's not konosuba
2) you keep your personal opinion for the thread so people can report your comment as being out of topic and irrelevant, pushing your expectation and experience from other game/douhjin in a review and rating the possibilityt of probable potential why denying the review of people commenting about the actual content is closer to trolling than reviewing :S
and now your saying the dev did a half assed job so it deserve a good rating because if it was made seriously by someone else it would deserve that rating ><
3) you are clearly not thinking straight, you agree that it lack content, that the scenario is poor with bad story telling, that the gameplay is unbalanced and the mapping sloppy and the art need getting used too because it's nothing like the original, parody is not using the visual and name of caracter in a completely irrelevant context and please don't try to justify that lack of content by pointing out again and again that it's a first version, people keep commenting about the fact that this game is a remake of an abandonned game from the same dev :S an d even if it was a first version of a completely new game, 10 min of mostly nothing is not something to be praise even if lot of people do it often, if hundreds of people start running naked in the street while throwing stone to some grandma they would not become alright because they are not alone so pointing out that the game lack content to enjoy or give an actual taste of the finished game is not irelevant
4) i'm not rating it for it's lack of content, i comment about it while pointing out the place where it is lacking, scenario, gameplay, art and yes current number of scene i'm not rating it based on external or potential factor, i'm reviewing about what's reviewable rating it as poor seem fitting to me i guess some realy starved fan would be ok to rate it average but i'm not and as you said people that don't know konosuba won't understand most of the humor ( if you put the humor away from a comedy your parody will suck) and the die hard fan of konosuba will just reject it with the art
i understand why your previous conversation was erased if none of your argument was based on the game or it's content