- Sep 11, 2018
- 295
- 390
NovelAi's image generator is pretty good if you don't mind the heavy anime style skew, but it does allow porn
i dont recall running into this problem before with other games. windows defender flagged it as a trojan.
So the artist says it's AI cg, it's tagged with AI cg and it looks like AI cg... what's your point exactly?
We could always have a new tag for "AI Transformation" for 6 fingered ladies. I am sure there is a niche market for that too
Does not look bad other than that. Good luck dev!
Does not look bad other than that. Good luck dev!
- May 13, 2018
- 323
- 882
- Jan 10, 2018
- 2,287
- 3,023
Feels very much like an AI-written story. Absolutely just a collection of cliches.
Not that the "game (not game)" is bad. But anyone who patronizes this dev for doing something they could easily learn to do on their own deserves to have their money taken away.
- Apr 17, 2020
- 389
- 464
- Apr 17, 2020
- 389
- 464
I get your point, but this pattern seems to have existed for many years. It is painful to think that FB and other social media would claim the copyright of every single piece of art that people upload. But I still feel it is inevitable that laws are way behind the development of technology, and industrial figures don't try to make any rules. Ideally, an organization should only use media that it pays for, however, Google and other technology giants wouldn't agree with this.
On the other hand, laws will NEVER restrain "seeing" arts, legislation can only define "using" art. Having their works seen by more people is also an innate motive for many artists. I agree with the other post, I also would browse a lot of art to get inspiration before I started my own works for some particular subjects, it would be weird to say I am infringing other artists' rights.
Of course, when it comes to AI, the process would be much faster and the range that it learns would be much larger. But at the end of the day, the nature of the process will be the same: An AI just "sees" many arts, extract what it needs and mix them together to make a different art, there would be very little ground to argue the juridical and ethical responsibility of "seeing" arts. After all, AI just reenacts a typical human behaviour: reflection --- this is the scary part, but it would be a totally different discourse.
Am I absolutely happy to see all this? Not really, but I think it's too difficult and early to make any conclusion so far. In the worst scenario, many of us have to change our thought and lifestyle, just like what happened in the industrial revolution and the IT era --- a nasty but inevitable future that doesn't care.
Last edited:
- Apr 17, 2020
- 389
- 464
true, patrons aren't customers, they offer support for artists, not a purchase, it would be risky, and better only invest in promising teams instead of games.
- Mar 2, 2018
- 118
- 252
Honestly, I don't mind the art and the fact it's just AI-generated. Evelyn looks pretty hot to me. It'd be cool to know what's used to make the art for the game though, and whatever prompts and seeds or whatever the fuck were used to create them, 'cause itd be neat to be able to replicate the characters ourself, but I have never bothered really looking into AI art, 'cause most of it is paywalled and a lot of them don't allow porn.