DC is writing the scenes differently making the process of adding the incest back in a patch much more difficult.im also kinda new to the convo of the incest tag, but is it not getting patched anymore???
What options did they miss? And what makes you say the whole thing could be shut down at any moment?They clearly didn't look hard enough, and I wouldn't be surprised. Also, patreon is far from being reliable, it's just popular. The whole thing can shut down at any moment, that wouldn't be reliable at all.
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOODC is writing the scenes differently making the process of adding the incest back in a patch much more difficult.
No, it really doesn't.It depends on how we interpret incest?
There's not many possibilities.Is the triangle between MC, Eve and Grace is incest?
And between MC, Mia and Helen is incest?
There are many possibilities.
Why?As a player, I expect that I will have the opportunity to incur to bed at the same time every mother-daughter or sister-sister.
Also don't forget Roxy's mother and cousin...Also, do not forget that we only know part of the MC family.
Me too. I dont like perfect body girls in SS.I'm waiting for progress with the girl from the mall. For some reason her not being overly attractive is a real turn on.
Yes. At the moment there are no such scenes, but it is certainly a place where there can be more incestuous content.That is, frankly spoken, bullshit. First, because there are no such scenes in the game, and second, c'mon, seriously?
You named Roxxy the first non-incest character, and that's simply wrong.
Well, they basically only started really working on 0.18 in early january, so mid to late march seems realistic.so the update will be out in June right?
Why?
Not happy at having to choose between Mia or Helen?
Picture?yesterday at the stream we would have gotten our chance to see the first glimpse of redesigned mia but people voted for jenny in a bikini of course
maybe it's happening today, i wonder how big her changes are going to be
So, you'd be happy to only be able to choose one, or the other, if it was better implemented?Yes. I'm not happy. Not because I necessarily want to have everything in one go, but because the choice made in the way it is is now pointless.
Except that as it stands it clearly is not, in any way whatsoever, anything to do with the MC's involvement.Such a choice may also suggest that MC is the reason why the Mia family is falling apart. And DarkCookie tries to introduce MC as a nice, friendly and helpful young man. It is much better to remove the selection here and create it in a place where it does not lead to such problems.
If DarkCookie manages to do it in a reliable way, yes. Then the choice is acceptable.So, you'd be happy to only be able to choose one, or the other, if it was better implemented?
Yes. But the choice between Helen and Mia suggests that one of them does not want a rival. To be reliable, at least one of them must be aware that MC is interested in the latter. If MC chooses the latter, the first one simply has to feel aversion to the other. That is, speaking directly MC will cause a split between mother and daughter.Except that as it stands it clearly is not, in any way whatsoever, anything to do with the MC's involvement.
They were already having problems before the MC gets involved. We see things when they're coming to a head, not the build up.
That's got nothing to do with Mia's family and their problems though. That's all after the problems have reached their breaking point.Yes. But the choice between Helen and Mia suggests that one of them does not want a rival. To be reliable, at least one of them must be aware that MC is interested in the latter. If MC chooses the latter, the first one simply has to feel aversion to the other. That is, speaking directly MC will cause a split between mother and daughter.