Nice.
I'm working on some stereoscopic VR stuff myself.
What did you use to render these in? AFAIK Daz studio has no option for stereoscopic 360's yet.
I am using Blender, which looks promising and I've managed to convert the models and materials but I have trouble getting the poses to work correctly. (Using Diffeomorphic Daz importer 1.2)
Just a few pointers:
- I don't think you need to distribute a PNG's, JPEG's at 80% quality look fine and the files are less than 1/10th the size.
- Not sure if it's intentional, and perhaps my Gear VR is to blame, but the girls look bigger than life.
- Adding noise reduction to the end of your render process will improve the stereoscopic effect.
- May 10, 2017
- 602
- 1,402
It was DAZ3D latest version. Here are the steps:
1) Create a new Cameras
2) Select the the Camera and go to Parameters -> Lens -> Lens Distortion Type and select spherical
3) On Lens Stereo Offset (mm), set 30 for the first image and -30 for the second image
4) On the render settings, set the Aspect Ration to 2:1 and the resolution to 4000x2000. Can be 2000x1000, but less then that the image will be blurried
Then, use the photoshop to create an image with 4000x4000 (or 2000x2000 depending how you rendered) and joint the 2 images together. The left image is on the top, the right image is on the bottom.
When you set the Lens Stereo Offset (mm), the image will be rendered shifted to the left/right depending how much milimeters you have set. The average distance between eyes center is 60mm, so you must render 30mm -30mm and this will emulate the distortion.
If you compare the two renders, the left eye image (top) will be shifted to the right and the right eye image will be shifted to the left.
On the main view of DAZ you will not see the spherical distorion or the shift. Only when you are rendering or using Iray Preview.
Open your image on your prefered 360 viewer and enjoy!!!!
1) Create a new Cameras
2) Select the the Camera and go to Parameters -> Lens -> Lens Distortion Type and select spherical
3) On Lens Stereo Offset (mm), set 30 for the first image and -30 for the second image
4) On the render settings, set the Aspect Ration to 2:1 and the resolution to 4000x2000. Can be 2000x1000, but less then that the image will be blurried
Then, use the photoshop to create an image with 4000x4000 (or 2000x2000 depending how you rendered) and joint the 2 images together. The left image is on the top, the right image is on the bottom.
When you set the Lens Stereo Offset (mm), the image will be rendered shifted to the left/right depending how much milimeters you have set. The average distance between eyes center is 60mm, so you must render 30mm -30mm and this will emulate the distortion.
If you compare the two renders, the left eye image (top) will be shifted to the right and the right eye image will be shifted to the left.
On the main view of DAZ you will not see the spherical distorion or the shift. Only when you are rendering or using Iray Preview.
Open your image on your prefered 360 viewer and enjoy!!!!
- May 10, 2017
- 602
- 1,402
- May 10, 2017
- 602
- 1,402
D and Max from BB on the beach.
- May 10, 2017
- 602
- 1,402
- Oct 9, 2017
- 1,060
- 1,310
Why is her head bigger than her ass? -.- That looks really creepy.
- Nov 30, 2017
- 19
- 27
Have you guys seen the 3D comic: YD3F - Sabotage 1-4? Incest story F-D, M-S. The main character there Tania kind of fits D, looks very much the same blond, tiny, big breasted, but much more corrupted daddy lover (yet) 
- May 10, 2017
- 602
- 1,402
- Aug 20, 2017
- 937
- 6,632
I like the idea and positions but the skin looks verry glossy (almost plastic like) im not sure if its a style choice or you tried wet/sweaty skin but that is the only thing that doesn't apeal to me but technically the renders look awsome in terms of lighting and positioning
Keep it up.
Keep it up.
The skin and renders look good but the scales are way off, imo. Daughter's head being proportionally large makes sense because her build is very petite, so when the guy is the same small scale, his head becomes tiny in comparison. Looks pretty funny.
- May 10, 2017
- 602
- 1,402
I had choosed the wet with this settings on my first test render and it was good at the time. I didn't checked the images because I only was changing the position, so everything "must be alright" :coldsweat::coldsweat::coldsweat:. Than I made a bunch of files with the position ready to be rendered, than I ran the batch render on all of them.
But yes, I agree with you. It ts way too glossy... :cryingface::cryingface::cryingface:. If I want to change it, i have to open all the sources and render again everything. It takes about 6~15 minutes to render each. Depending what is apearing :'(.
- May 10, 2017
- 602
- 1,402
I agree with you too. This was my first render and I didn't had checked it and compared her with others. When I have seen, the images was already rendered :'
''(.
- May 10, 2017
- 602
- 1,402
Now that I already had posed everything and cant go back.. Here are the Part 4
And before anyone says that, the cum is too white (and I have exagerated a little bitx'Dx'Dx'D) and cant go back either :cryingface:.
And before anyone says that, the cum is too white (and I have exagerated a little bitx'Dx'Dx'D) and cant go back either :cryingface:.
- Oct 13, 2016
- 2,755
- 9,138
- Jul 17, 2017
- 95
- 16