Why Do You Play Incest Games?
- Thread starter lexus33
- Start date
-
- Tags
- Sep 18, 2017
- 1,010
- 1,788
You are probably better off with Pornhub
I love Incest because there is natrual barrier between two actors you have to slowly break and it makes the romance advance more slowly. In lots of Non-Incest Games you get your Cock sucked within the first 10 Minutes and thats kinda boring.
- Oct 12, 2017
- 1,090
- 1,116
My incest themed games typically have a common theme. Mother, daughter, aunt, niece, etc. Though typically unrelated to the guy but if they're doing each other I don't mind either. With the exception of Son of a Bitch, I typically shy away from games where the MC is related to the people I'm screwing. Guess watching others incest turns me on, long as you're apart of the actions of course
- Jan 26, 2018
- 53
- 215
- Sep 25, 2018
- 8,945
- 10,816
Easy, easy, my friend, with this kind of assumption here.
With pedophilia we mostly associate an underage person having an sexual relationship with an adult (in legal terms of the law).
The common sense is instead total different as the law. A Boy (18) and a Girl (16) is still pedophilia (by law). A man (85) and a girl (18) is not considered as pedophilia by law anymore.
The common sense: A man (over 18) and an underage person (mostly a girl) you can call that bad pedophilia, because the an adult take advantage of an underage person for their inexperience. Girls will always have an extra protection status in our minds. The same goes actually for underage boys as long the abuser is a man. Doesn't matter if he "loves" the boy or use him for his personal sexual satisfaction. (Man = allows bad!)
The case for a female abuser it is different:
1. Case: the female abuse the underage person in a bad/harmful way -> reaction from society: Bad women! How could she etc...
2. Case: the female abuser has sex with an underage person (nothing more; no abuse in a bad/harmful way) -> reaction from society: Wow! Where were this kind of women during my childhood?! Nice! (Women abuser = not always bad!)
Best example for this is actually South Park S09E10 "Miss Teacher Bangs a Boy". Take a look at all the female teachers that got arrested for having sex with their students. For non of them you will feel, that they deserve 10 years in prison. It is the other way: You will feel pity for them and also envy the young student that had sex with them!
Why boys feel attractive to older women is quite simple to understand: It is a way of 'respondent' (classic) conditioning. Basically it happens during puberty, when you starts to recognize a women as a sexual partner. The trigger could be your friends good looking mother, the sexy dressed lady in the TV, a model in a magazine, a teacher, just any older women, which shows some kind of kindness to you and likes to talk to you (non-sexual affection). It is biological and not a metal disorder like pedophilia.
Besides there is always this myth, were an older women needs to introduce the boy into 'manhood' by taking his virginity, and teaching him the 'way to please a women/future wife'. Even back during the time of industrialization, one of the maids task was it, to jerk-off the 'young Master' before bedtime. Cause it was considered healthy and a good way to help the child to sleep.
But yeah, over the years our view (moral/ethics) on certain things have changes, because of the influence of politics and religious groups... Heck! Just 20 years ago (until the end of the 80s) you were able to buy child pornography (Lolita, Incest content) in a normal kiosk in Europe (thank God they are outlawed now!).
So, calling someone a pedo is not a nice thing to do!
Umm. Look: If someone calls you a pedo on the internet and you react with a 3000 word essay on the meaning and history of pedophilia... Well, I don't want to spell it out for you what that means and how it gets interpreted
Partially thats just "bad" writing by most devs...
Most (all?) women I know will not suck a persons cock within 10 minutes. At the very least this will take a couple of dates and commitment towards a steady relationship. Other women wait until marriage and some will never suck cock at all.
And although a bit rare, this kind of "hard-to-get" women exist in games as well. Life with Mary is a great example. The character Molly in My Sister my Roommate is another one, although there she's not the main love interest. In the last game, the MC's sister is, by virtue of her personality, more sexually involved with the MC than Molly. And I have to say that game does feel quite natural.
Of course IRL, incest would be a rather big barrier. Just saying that there are also other barriers IRL that are rarely used in games.
The difference is, I think, that in the case of incest, the barrier is the realisation that a close family member could be a romantic interest at all. Once that realisation is there, and accepted by both partners (e.g. to the point of regularly french kissing), I don't think that there is a significantly higher barrier to e.g. a blowjob, compared to a shy and inexperienced girl who is not related to you. If both partners are experienced and sexually open, the response could be "fuck it, let's do this!" instead. This kind of realisation is portrayed very well in Intimate Relations.
Last edited by a moderator:
- Sep 25, 2018
- 8,945
- 10,816
It might be an overreaction, but calling someone a 'pedo' without knowing, what pedophilia even is, is not ok. Thanks to the internet it has become easy to call someone anything, because you hide yourself behind a screen.Umm. Look: If someone calls you a pedo on the internet and you react with a 3000 word essay on the meaning and history of pedophilia... Well, I don't want to spell it out for you what that means and how it gets interpreted
Would you like to be called a 'rapist or worse' here on F95 just because I feel like that? - I guess not!
Beside that, he even quoted a year old post out of the context, which had nothing to do with pedophilia. Just saying....
- Dec 9, 2017
- 161
- 293
I love the genre because of its taboo and corruption aspect of the story.
-The reluctance that turns into love/lust later on in the game really gets me off. (one example is Dating my Daughter, Daughter slowly succumbing to Father's deeds. also some parts of Incest story sister path)
-The curious innocence of one person also does the trick. (I'd say Big brother Lisa Mentor route, and DmD, any game that would make the female character sexually curious)
-The slow tease that turns into pure ecstasy later on in the story has a pretty big impact on my fetish (Kira route on Snow Daze)
-The unexpectedness also takes the cake for me (handjobs turning into blowjobs, frotage/pussyjobs into sex, etc.) They're usually the part of the story that the female character is either really horny, or wants to make the male character happy (DmD)
If someone can recommend some games that also has these types of sub-genres, that would be great.
-The reluctance that turns into love/lust later on in the game really gets me off. (one example is Dating my Daughter, Daughter slowly succumbing to Father's deeds. also some parts of Incest story sister path)
-The curious innocence of one person also does the trick. (I'd say Big brother Lisa Mentor route, and DmD, any game that would make the female character sexually curious)
-The slow tease that turns into pure ecstasy later on in the story has a pretty big impact on my fetish (Kira route on Snow Daze)
-The unexpectedness also takes the cake for me (handjobs turning into blowjobs, frotage/pussyjobs into sex, etc.) They're usually the part of the story that the female character is either really horny, or wants to make the male character happy (DmD)
If someone can recommend some games that also has these types of sub-genres, that would be great.
- Mar 8, 2018
- 2,762
- 3,782
Yeah, no, that never happens to me.
I agree with the rest of your reply though. So I cut that out.
- Mar 8, 2018
- 2,762
- 3,782
I think so yes, there was a disconnect between my brain and fingers earlier. Out of commision for days I tells ya.
I was a late virgin, so i become searching more and more taboo things that can still excite me. I'm a lot into incest games, that's one of my main fetish. I'm into brother-sister, sister-sister, dad-daughter, uncle-niece, cousin-cousin. I prefer when female partner is younger than the male one.
And maybe it would shock you but i will do it also in real life if i had a chance to do so (willingly, rape is always wrong). I'm into my younger cousin for years, i won't pass a chance if i have one to be with her, to love and have sex with her.
Incest is also a simple plot for game creation. So stories in this games are often better than in others games.
The fact that in our society that's taboo sure excite me as i'm in any things a non conformist. But for me, prohibition of incest is just a reactionnary religious heritage who need to deasapear in XXI century (like deseappear prohibition of masturbation or homosexuality). I don't see where the problem is witgh consensual incest, why so much people say that's wrong : in fact, even them don't know. When you talk about it with people and say "well, you say incest is wrong, but why?", they have often nothing to answer.
I don't thing there is something we can call normaility when we talk about sexuality. Normality is just a socially construct norm, things that's majority of people consuder right. It has change in history. it can change again. For exemple, in ancient egypt, incest wasn't prohibited, contrary in fact, it was consider sacred, to the point that's in some region, 1 on 4 mariage were brother-sister one, like a registry prove. It doesn't cause a lot of social problem, but some biological one, naturally, like genetic desease But now we know contraception and abortion, genetic prevention, so the argument of disabilities cause by incest pregnancy isn't as accurate as it was.
I think every people have the right to love and fuck, there can't be discrimination on this base on gender or sexual orientation (for me, incest is a sexual orientation). That's a violation of egality in front of law.
And maybe it would shock you but i will do it also in real life if i had a chance to do so (willingly, rape is always wrong). I'm into my younger cousin for years, i won't pass a chance if i have one to be with her, to love and have sex with her.
Incest is also a simple plot for game creation. So stories in this games are often better than in others games.
The fact that in our society that's taboo sure excite me as i'm in any things a non conformist. But for me, prohibition of incest is just a reactionnary religious heritage who need to deasapear in XXI century (like deseappear prohibition of masturbation or homosexuality). I don't see where the problem is witgh consensual incest, why so much people say that's wrong : in fact, even them don't know. When you talk about it with people and say "well, you say incest is wrong, but why?", they have often nothing to answer.
I don't thing there is something we can call normaility when we talk about sexuality. Normality is just a socially construct norm, things that's majority of people consuder right. It has change in history. it can change again. For exemple, in ancient egypt, incest wasn't prohibited, contrary in fact, it was consider sacred, to the point that's in some region, 1 on 4 mariage were brother-sister one, like a registry prove. It doesn't cause a lot of social problem, but some biological one, naturally, like genetic desease But now we know contraception and abortion, genetic prevention, so the argument of disabilities cause by incest pregnancy isn't as accurate as it was.
I think every people have the right to love and fuck, there can't be discrimination on this base on gender or sexual orientation (for me, incest is a sexual orientation). That's a violation of egality in front of law.
The major problems caused by incest, historically, were:
1) birth defects and hereditary illnesses
2) primogeniture--problems with inheritance of land and property
3) it creates a threat to the father as head of household
In a more modern sense, there are issues around molestation, abuse of authority, social stigma and trauma, and major disruption of family hierarchy and harmony. I also think it's become synonymous with child molestation(and pedophilia) in culture/society.
You could argue for legalizing consensual sex of all kinds between those above the age of majority. You'd still wind up with some nightmarish stories about fathers manipulating their 18 year old daughters into sexual relationships. I think legalization of incest is something society would need to think long and hard about(no pun intended, but lol anyway).
1) birth defects and hereditary illnesses
2) primogeniture--problems with inheritance of land and property
3) it creates a threat to the father as head of household
In a more modern sense, there are issues around molestation, abuse of authority, social stigma and trauma, and major disruption of family hierarchy and harmony. I also think it's become synonymous with child molestation(and pedophilia) in culture/society.
You could argue for legalizing consensual sex of all kinds between those above the age of majority. You'd still wind up with some nightmarish stories about fathers manipulating their 18 year old daughters into sexual relationships. I think legalization of incest is something society would need to think long and hard about(no pun intended, but lol anyway).
That's problem are i think inherant to patriarchy and incest effectively aggravate them.
I desagree with your analyse on modern days. Abuse and rape also exist in non incestual situation. Do we ban all sex in reaction? Evidently no. So why banning incest for the abuse of a minority? We just have to do as we do with the others rapes: punish severely those who do this and also keep the fact that the person is a relative as a aggravating factor in front of law.
Defining incest with the case we know (the only one that's come to law) is like defining sex with rape case in court. That's stupid and unscientific.
Problem is that for most people incest=incest rape. They don't think a consensual incest can exist (mystery is there is more and more people who watch incest porn, that's one of the most popular trend, so most of those people must be hypocritics, defending prohibition in public, watching incest porn in private!) Medias have brainwashed them via tabloids and the constent depiction of the worse affairs. There is also role of religion: monotheism religions have ban incest (even if incest is present in the Bible and not necessary present in a bad way). If people were more educated, they would stop this witch hunt and deny their beliefs and prejudices without scientific basis.
I hope that depictions more positive of incest in popular culture (in HBO series for example) can maybe have a role similar to Fifty Shades of Gray with BDSM: improve social acceptation of incest. But it will probably take time anyway.
I think incest should be legal between consenting adult like any other form of sex. That's a the case in some countries in Europe (including mine, France) and also in some America States and also more socialy accept.
I desagree with your analyse on modern days. Abuse and rape also exist in non incestual situation. Do we ban all sex in reaction? Evidently no. So why banning incest for the abuse of a minority? We just have to do as we do with the others rapes: punish severely those who do this and also keep the fact that the person is a relative as a aggravating factor in front of law.
Defining incest with the case we know (the only one that's come to law) is like defining sex with rape case in court. That's stupid and unscientific.
Problem is that for most people incest=incest rape. They don't think a consensual incest can exist (mystery is there is more and more people who watch incest porn, that's one of the most popular trend, so most of those people must be hypocritics, defending prohibition in public, watching incest porn in private!) Medias have brainwashed them via tabloids and the constent depiction of the worse affairs. There is also role of religion: monotheism religions have ban incest (even if incest is present in the Bible and not necessary present in a bad way). If people were more educated, they would stop this witch hunt and deny their beliefs and prejudices without scientific basis.
I hope that depictions more positive of incest in popular culture (in HBO series for example) can maybe have a role similar to Fifty Shades of Gray with BDSM: improve social acceptation of incest. But it will probably take time anyway.
I think incest should be legal between consenting adult like any other form of sex. That's a the case in some countries in Europe (including mine, France) and also in some America States and also more socialy accept.
- May 8, 2017
- 2,885
- 3,286
Sex isn't banned (if it even could) for this simple reason that negative behaviours are just a small % of whole thing. With incest it's different since vast majority of sex abuse of minors is incest-based. Real life incest is almost an equivalent of child abuse and rape. Those few examples when it's not the case have usually clear source in psychological issues or some different medical issues. Not to say it's hard to opt for a clearly harmful behaviour that screws our genetics. It's been always a tabboo for many non-religious reasons and it's really unlikely it will change in a predictable future.
- Sep 11, 2017
- 817
- 919
In modern days incest is banned because of the genetic disadvantages and possible abuse, not for religious reasons. This may mean, that some countries may indeed lift their bans on incest, some like the Netherlands and Portugal already did. While this may seem shocking at first glance, there is indeed no true reason why non-reproductive incest between consenting adults would be a crime.
Same reason I like playing violent games or games where I can play the villain, etc. It's a way to explore my dark side without any consequences to me or anyone else. The taboo aspect of it increases the appeal for me. Doesn't mean I have even the slightest interest in doing any of that stuff in real life because I don't. It's a game. Same as any other form of entertainment. Reading a book, watching a movie or a TV show about some taboo subject doesn't mean I want to do that in real life. Doesn't mean I don't fantasize about it or enjoy imagining what it might be like.
How many people have imagined what it might be like to beat the shit out of someone who bullied them or a particularly nasty boss, or whatever (or punish them in other ways)? I know I have, but I wouldn't actually do it IRL.
If the types of media we enjoy consuming had any bearing on our real personalities then I'd be some sort of depraved psychopathic mass murdering, raping, super villain by now when in real life I just live a nice average life.
- Jul 10, 2017
- 6,158
- 6,553
Pondering about the question just give a simple answer to the question; because we do?
Could just as well been "why do you play rape games, or "insert any type of fetish". People are wired the way they are with desires and fetish's. Doesn't mean they will or want to act out on them.
Very few games out there that incest themed actually any good though. A lot of them more blue copies of each other with the usual line up of stereo type characters.
Could just as well been "why do you play rape games, or "insert any type of fetish". People are wired the way they are with desires and fetish's. Doesn't mean they will or want to act out on them.
Very few games out there that incest themed actually any good though. A lot of them more blue copies of each other with the usual line up of stereo type characters.
"With incest it's different since vast majority of sex abuse of minors is incest-based. Real life incest is almost an equivalent of child abuse and rape. "
What's your source? You make pure affirmations without any argument or proof or source. This have no argumentative value. And you speak about pedophilia, not incest here. This argument is totally unrelated to incest betweeen consenting adults, i was advocating here.
Want to add a thing. There is some countries were incest is legal. If we search for criminal statistics on this countries, it shows that there isn't more abuse or rape on children case in this countries than in the one were incest is banned, that's mostly the contrary in fact. Link between incest and child abuse isn't proven, just like it was for homosexuality. That's prejudices.
We know only few cases of consenting adult incest because there isn't research on this. If we don't search we don't find. Also those people are hidding themselves cause incest is socially banned (even when that's legal). There were just the same arguments against masturbation or homosexuality just a half century ago.
I already answer on procreation and genetic problems. Incest make probablity (that's the important world, those diseases exist also for non incest pregrancies) of a rare genetic disease more important, cause those disease are recessive (they need two examplaries of the same bad allele to express). That's not like "all incest childs get disabilities", there is just a increase probability.
But sex isn't just procreation in our society (or you still live in the Middle Age). And we also know how to prevent those pregnancies: contraception,... Also we know whose gene are responsaible for those disease: just have to make preventive genetic tests (for all, not only incest couple). And in the case there is still a baby and he/she has those disease, there is abortion. So i don't see where the proble is, the argument is anachronic.
A study in Island (a country that study a lot incest cause they all are kin because of the small population and lack nof immigration) show statistically that in darwinian term (maximum life esperancy and maximum offsprings) the best is to date second cousin, not a stranger.
We are biologically wired to love people who are close to us, even genetically. thats what prove the studies on genetical sexual attraction:
It was a taboo in some countries (mostly monotheists patriarcal countries, prohibition of incest probably start with judaism), not everywhere. I already site case of ancient egypt. In Persia and in the Steppes, mother child incest was consider sacred and zoroastrism have a large tolerance for all form of incest anyway. Incestuous (cousin mostly) marriage were common also in most area as a way to keep posession in the family, to not spread heritage. Noble families use it largely: for example, Alexander the Great's sister was married to her uncle. There was no such thing as universal prohibition of incest, anthropologists (Levi Strauss particularly) have been blinded by eurocentrism.
And for those who believe in the Bible, there were just Adam and Eve at the start, they say. So next generation, there necessary had a incest or humanity must have deseappears! There is also others case of incest in Bible, particularly the really disturbing case of Loth and his daughters.
Incest is also commun between animals. So that's not against nature.
I persist, i see no valid and rationnal argument for incest prohibition in knowday society.
What's your source? You make pure affirmations without any argument or proof or source. This have no argumentative value. And you speak about pedophilia, not incest here. This argument is totally unrelated to incest betweeen consenting adults, i was advocating here.
Want to add a thing. There is some countries were incest is legal. If we search for criminal statistics on this countries, it shows that there isn't more abuse or rape on children case in this countries than in the one were incest is banned, that's mostly the contrary in fact. Link between incest and child abuse isn't proven, just like it was for homosexuality. That's prejudices.
We know only few cases of consenting adult incest because there isn't research on this. If we don't search we don't find. Also those people are hidding themselves cause incest is socially banned (even when that's legal). There were just the same arguments against masturbation or homosexuality just a half century ago.
I already answer on procreation and genetic problems. Incest make probablity (that's the important world, those diseases exist also for non incest pregrancies) of a rare genetic disease more important, cause those disease are recessive (they need two examplaries of the same bad allele to express). That's not like "all incest childs get disabilities", there is just a increase probability.
But sex isn't just procreation in our society (or you still live in the Middle Age). And we also know how to prevent those pregnancies: contraception,... Also we know whose gene are responsaible for those disease: just have to make preventive genetic tests (for all, not only incest couple). And in the case there is still a baby and he/she has those disease, there is abortion. So i don't see where the proble is, the argument is anachronic.
A study in Island (a country that study a lot incest cause they all are kin because of the small population and lack nof immigration) show statistically that in darwinian term (maximum life esperancy and maximum offsprings) the best is to date second cousin, not a stranger.
We are biologically wired to love people who are close to us, even genetically. thats what prove the studies on genetical sexual attraction:
You must be registered to see the links
It was a taboo in some countries (mostly monotheists patriarcal countries, prohibition of incest probably start with judaism), not everywhere. I already site case of ancient egypt. In Persia and in the Steppes, mother child incest was consider sacred and zoroastrism have a large tolerance for all form of incest anyway. Incestuous (cousin mostly) marriage were common also in most area as a way to keep posession in the family, to not spread heritage. Noble families use it largely: for example, Alexander the Great's sister was married to her uncle. There was no such thing as universal prohibition of incest, anthropologists (Levi Strauss particularly) have been blinded by eurocentrism.
And for those who believe in the Bible, there were just Adam and Eve at the start, they say. So next generation, there necessary had a incest or humanity must have deseappears! There is also others case of incest in Bible, particularly the really disturbing case of Loth and his daughters.
Incest is also commun between animals. So that's not against nature.
I persist, i see no valid and rationnal argument for incest prohibition in knowday society.