That was a fairly annoying ending. Props to the dev for seeing it through, though.
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content.
Log in or register now.
if this the only ending you can get then honestly what the point of all the choices in the game i truly hate theses kind of endings it happen in a lot of fantastic games like realy after all this time waiting for the game to get finished so i can play and enjoy the different ending that we will have because of our choices and then we get an ending like this i hope that this is not the only ending we have
- May 16, 2017
- 3,182
- 1,771
- May 16, 2017
- 5,198
- 17,618
wasnt this game named mothers seduction or something like that i guess pateron made them change the name since i last visited this thread
Yes... it was originally called Mother's seduction. and, yes, as far as I know, the name was changed to comply with patreon rules.
- Apr 4, 2017
- 136
- 45
- Oct 23, 2017
- 302
- 380
so do you actually get to fuck the mother or not? i've stopped playing this game few months back and want to know if its worth playing the completed
- Apr 4, 2017
- 136
- 45
- Feb 12, 2018
- 1,153
- 1,429
You don't really need a walkthrough for the final update. Use the 0.17 WT to get there. And in the last part just listen to what the mother says, find the key and then fuck her. After that there is a long ass dialogue and the game is essentially over.
- Sep 14, 2016
- 248
- 251
- Jul 25, 2018
- 424
- 136
No one owes you a walkthrough or something like that. Especially with your attitude.
On the other hand, you could've spend 5 min of your time and just open the code file by urself to check the variables.
Answer is: Donatello
- Oct 23, 2016
- 4,399
- 13,129
Yeah, but I was not giving advice. Someone wrote that it's not possible to have a rollback function in a renpy game that includes rolling back over choices and I pointed out that's not the case.
I wasn't making a point about if it would fuck up your game or not, I was merely explaining that what the other person wrote isn't correct.
You then decided to make it about whether doing that was a good or bad thing to do, which, as I've explained right here, wasn't at all what my post was about.