VN Ren'Py FemDom Stories [v0.4.1] [Isvrat]

[Kadajko]

A fetish isn't sexism though. Women who have rape fantasies don't hate women. You have to be able to make the distinction between the fetish and reality, or in the case of VN's, make the distinction between fiction and reality. If you're not into hard femdom, that's fine, but don't make it out to be something that it isn't as a reason.

What I call sexism is this thought that in order to dominate you have to penetrate exactly like a man, that it is not rape unless you imitate a man and use a strapon. I think that women can rape just fine with their vagina. I don't have a problem with pegging as a rule, but the message is clearly there when majority of femdom games don't have a single vaginal sex scene and every time it is only pegging.

I don't remember the exact name of the game, but I do remember that there was a scene where two women magically made it so that the mans dick was hard, it hurt for him and he couldn't cum, then they both rode him until they were both satisfied - good example of how it can be done.

 

[ATorres69]

I want to pinch in on the poll about attitude towards femdom games:

I personally love female domination but it seems that too many such games:

1) Lean too much into sadism to the point that it almost completely stops being sexual, and it is just pure violence.

2) There is too much sexism in such games, because liking dick is seen as degrading through the male lens, so the women never like cock and have to imitate men by using strapons and stuff to penetrate the male, as opposed to simply enjoying the dick on their own terms how they like it.

What comes out of it are very weird dynamics, like every single woman in femdom games is not sexually attracted to men and is a sadist.

I would love to see some games that are a direct equivalent of maledom games, where women simply fuck the man when they want, how they want. Because a direct equivalent of most femdom games would be if a bunch of men dominated a woman, asking only for blowjobs, would beat the shit out of her, and would never have sex with her, and would instead put a chastity cage on her pussy and say how her pussy is not worthy of their cocks.

I second this. I consider myself as someone who likes dominate females. Both those points are something that would be a huge turn off. A girl who just get's horny and has her way with a man without reversing roles just feels much more natural. No need for a strap on. She has her own body parts. She can sit on the guy, forcing him to eat her out.

And yeah, I'm sick of violence in porn games. I don't like seeing people get hurt (even if they're fictional, lol)

 

[ATorres69]

What I call sexism is this thought that in order to dominate you have to penetrate exactly like a man, that it is not rape unless you imitate a man and use a strapon. I think that women can rape just fine with their vagina. I don't have a problem with pegging as a rule, but the message is clearly there when majority of femdom games don't have a single vaginal sex scene and every time it is only pegging.

I don't remember the exact name of the game, but I do remember that there was a scene where two women magically made it so that the mans dick was hard, it hurt for him and he couldn't cum, then they both rode him until they were both satisfied - good example of how it can be done.

Magic girls..... gotta watch out for them... If they come near me, I be like.

 

[Isvrat]

What you're discussing here is a thread about orgasm denial, strapon and role reversal - part of a thread about destroying the image of the masculine male character and further feminizing, which intersects with LGBTQ+ and is quite popular with both humiliation enthusiasts and those just interested in the topic of transgenders and feminism (kinky hyperbalized feminism).

However, female dominance often works “like male dominance, but in reverse.” Part of male domination is that the girl has constant orgasms and goes crazy from it? In female domination, the man goes crazy from the lack of orgasm.

 

[Jujansol]

This game bothered me. Too many characters and uninteresting ones get a lot of time and it's stupid to neglect the important characters. It feels too varied and sometimes that's not good, becomes boring when you're waiting for a certain character to make an appearance or a certain event and it's all filler. This game is all fillers.

 

[NeoKilua]

This game bothered me. Too many characters and uninteresting ones get a lot of time and it's stupid to neglect the important characters. It feels too varied and sometimes that's not good, becomes boring when you're waiting for a certain character to make an appearance or a certain event and it's all filler. This game is all fillers.

Probably the character u want is a,side characters if u played it well you know who the main characters and maybe to u it filler but , i doubt u played even the last game cause, this is continious

 

[Jujansol]

Probably the character u want is a,side characters if u played it well you know who the main characters and maybe to u it filler but , i doubt u played even the last game cause, this is continious

I care about Saki she doesn't get enough screen time, does she? Not dominating, at least, but having some boring conversation with the main red haired girl. And also I played both games. Meanwhile the sort of characters that get screen time are worthless, like that Alex chick.