VN Ren'Py Completed Fetish Locator [Week 3 v3.4.8] [ViNovella]

[Garybaldi]

I've just downlaoded W3-2.2.24 and used a mod but there are no images when I try and load from last save or even previous savse, any suggestions? Thanks

 

[Canto Forte]

This is a different game, it has bonus pics and added renders all over.
A save from the normal version would have variables in different strokes.
Try the autosaves, they might have saved in key working moments this extended version
can pick up from.

 

[Brenor1]

On the second week, I ran into an error.

Spoiler

You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.

Downloaded various versions from here. One and the same in all of them. I can’t go further, I can’t miss it, if I ignore it, it will take me to the main menu. What can I do?

 

[RC-1138 Boss]

There is a news update from a few hours ago. Can some kind soul share it please?

You must be registered to see the links

 

[MikehuntHerpa]

Why is each week their own game and why is each week getting progressively worse in terms of QoL compared to the previous week? First week had detailed explanations what each choice would result in and had a gallery viewer. Second week got rid of the detailed consequences for each choice but still had some kind of explanation and still had the gallery viewer. Third week got rid of both of them. Confusing regression.

 

[gregers]

Why is each week their own game and why is each week getting progressively worse in terms of QoL compared to the previous week? First week had detailed explanations what each choice would result in and had a gallery viewer. Second week got rid of the detailed consequences for each choice but still had some kind of explanation and still had the gallery viewer. Third week got rid of both of them. Confusing regression.

Those QoL details were added to the earlier weeks after they were story-complete. Similar things presumably planned for week 3.

The split into weeks helps keep file sizes to a manageable level.

 

[HeavyMetalSuizid]

It's kindergarten level petty though. Obviously - still assuming this scenario is still correct - somebody was A-OK with the blackmail content but still used it to spoil other people's fun in a "If I cannot have what I want then you aren't allowed to, too" kind of way. If somebody really has a problem with blackmailing (incest, pineapple pizza) content and goes snitching, that is somewhat strange and maybe they need a different hobby, but at least its consistent. If you complain about something you don't even dislike just to spite others, that's hypocritical and all about "me", everything has to suit my taste level of entitlement. No matter who else suffers, because it affects not only the dev (and think about how many TV shows would still be on if anybody disliking a story arc could just cancel it) but also thousands of people who did like the game and had no problem with NTR or at least not with the optional, clearly labeled, clearly warned about NTR in this game.

Right of property, prima facie, gives right to exclusion from property.
If I own a mall I may well ban certain petitioners from setting up shop in my mall, afforded with some digression.
If I own a website, I may choose, again, afforded with digression, to not tolerate certain contents being displayed.

Arguing for non-compliance seems an intellectual non-starter, one ought to, instead, argue for possible alternatives, within the confines of lawfulness.

Such, at least, is my understanding.

 

[HeavyMetalSuizid]

I guess you didn't see the NTR-embossed cock cage hanging above the mantelpiece? Or would hanging under be more accurate?

The MC's internal monologue professed a clear preference, and hinted not (in significant capacity, that is) at the horror that lay behind said choice.
I came here, trawling for some minutes, so that I may enjoy the fruits of blissful certainty at having avoided such horror.

On another note, what exactly was censored?
I only came around to trying the game this week...

And finally, are there plans to not make your inquiry to Nora on Day 15 a throwaway line, but have consequences?
Frankly, I can hardly think of another reason for including it, when its premise was not established in a prior game.

 

[Cartageno]

so a harem game (mostly) and now a choice to add NTR with the main LI.

I would argue that this is not a harem game in the common understanding - there may be endings which qualify for the harem tag from this site but even that isn't certain. But a harem needs love interests, and only a select few probably count as such, most are just fuck buddies.

after playing the 2 week, what I could enjoy in the ntr-route:
- they ask u to ntr your girlfriend. (u get to know that after u picked NTR)
now, the MC can "fuck that, no way in hell" or "try to convince the girlfriend to do"
and it should be light stuff, like making out, kissing, grabbing touching. but thats it. no penetration or stripping.
while the MC has total control to end it when he want.

If MC consents or even controls, that isn't NTR anymore. That would be swinging. NTR is a love interest being entangled with somebody against what MC wants.

Right of property, prima facie, gives right to exclusion from property.
If I own a mall I may well ban certain petitioners from setting up shop in my mall, afforded with some digression.
If I own a website, I may choose, again, afforded with digression, to not tolerate certain contents being displayed.

Arguing for non-compliance seems an intellectual non-starter, one ought to, instead, argue for possible alternatives, within the confines of lawfulness.

Such, at least, is my understanding.

Mine as well, see my other post where I stated that Patreon is perfectly fine in my eyes kicking a game off which does not adhere to their statutes.

The post you quoted was about another aspect however, somebody telling on this game just because he did not like how it developed. Note that this scenario is just an assumption put forward by some people and not known fact. But if this assumption holds, somebody was telling just out of spite, not out of actual interest in the wrongdoings. And that is (or would be) in my eyes hypocritical and, as I said, kindergarten level. Patreon acting on that, again, was fine.

 

[baka]

what I mean is that its too much to create a pure-NTR route when the whole game from start is a fuck-feast for the MC, that is a typical harem-setting. to add NTR week 3 is very strange. that is why I wrote that it should be light stuff to not shock people.
also, I usually enjoy corruption/ntr game but this was bad and not working at all.

 

[HeavyMetalSuizid]

I would argue that this is not a harem game in the common understanding - there may be endings which qualify for the harem tag from this site but even that isn't certain. But a harem needs love interests, and only a select few probably count as such, most are just fuck buddies.



If MC consents or even controls, that isn't NTR anymore. That would be swinging. NTR is a love interest being entangled with somebody against what MC wants.



Mine as well, see my other post where I stated that Patreon is perfectly fine in my eyes kicking a game off which does not adhere to their statutes.

The post you quoted was about another aspect however, somebody telling on this game just because he did not like how it developed. Note that this scenario is just an assumption put forward by some people and not known fact. But if this assumption holds, somebody was telling just out of spite, not out of actual interest in the wrongdoings. And that is (or would be) in my eyes hypocritical and, as I said, kindergarten level. Patreon acting on that, again, was fine.

You could be inclined to argue, however, that the assumption you elaborated on is unlikely, and would then be forced to conclude, I believe, that any action supporting the enforcement of the law of the land, if the supporting party can't be established to be in conflict with law, can not be hypocritical, absolving the accused.
Additionally, all people (if legal precedent has been established) may enjoy the rights bestowed, and carried over from the state of nature, even those previously found guilty.
Whether you, on moral grounds, would deny them such, deeming it hypocritical, is another discussion entirely.

Some would, perhaps derisively, call it semantics, but how would you, if the accusation holds true, go about establishing what I'll call malicious intent or bad faith action, as opposed to a sudden bout of moralistic fervor, anyhow? - Not to mention our bless'd presumption of innocence

 

[Cartageno]

You could be inclined to argue, however, that the assumption you elaborated on is unlikely, and would then be forced to conclude, I believe, that any action supporting the enforcement of the law of the land, if the supporting party can't be established to be in conflict with law, can not be hypocritical, absolving the accused.
Additionally, all people (if legal precedent has been established) may enjoy the rights bestowed, and carried over from the state of nature, even those previously found guilty.
Whether you, on moral grounds, would deny them such, deeming it hypocritical, is another discussion entirely.

Some would, perhaps derisively, call it semantics, but how would you, if the accusation holds true, go about establishing what I'll call malicious intent or bad faith action, as opposed to a sudden bout of moralistic fervor, anyhow? - Not to mention our bless'd presumption of innocence

We cannot argue it "in court", and like you I am not entirely convinced that the assumption holds true even though quite a few people have brought it up, but as you said it is another discussion entirely - we may never know whether it happened and somebody acted in a hypocritical way. However, us not knowing would not change the fact whether or not it is. If I steal something and nobody ever finds out, let alone is able to prove I did it, I would still be a thief.

 

[Game Lord]

Trying to play Week 2 (v2.0.21) unofficial Android version from post #4,225 at this time but it's not recognizing my Week 1 (v1.0.40) Android version but Week 2's game won't recognize my Week 1 end game save. They're both Extended Version + Walkthrough DLC versions so I thought the save would be compatible but obviously something is off here.

I've tried manually copying over the end game save myself from Week 1's game folder to Week 2's game folder as well as Week 1's Persistent file too and still no go.

Does the naming structure of Week 1's end game save need to be in a certain format for it to work possibly in Week 2's version as currently it is named:
50-1660696546-LT1.save

Any assistance regarding this would be appreciated.

 

[the66]

Trying to play Week 2 (v2.0.21) unofficial Android version from post #4,225 at this time but it's not recognizing my Week 1 (v1.0.40) Android version but Week 2's game won't recognize my Week 1 end game save. They're both Extended Version + Walkthrough DLC versions so I thought the save would be compatible but obviously something is off here.

I've tried manually copying over the end game save myself from Week 1's game folder to Week 2's game folder as well as Week 1's Persistent file too and still no go.

Does the naming structure of Week 1's end game save need to be in a certain format for it to work possibly in Week 2's version as currently it is named:
50-1660696546-LT1.save

Any assistance regarding this would be appreciated.

if you use the official week 1 release you have to rename the multipersistent file FetishLocator to FetishLocator.the66 and copy it to RenPy/Persistent on Android 10 and newer or to Android/data/RenPy/Persistent, you need no save files.

 

[Game Lord]

So at the end of Week 1, the game indicates that ErikaRed (AmRose) is short of her points goal and that we can transfer her some of our points. That we can either not transfer her any at all, 10, 25, or all of our points. How many points is she short though? Would 10 points be enough for her to reach her goal or what? Does the game indicate one way or the other regarding this?

 

[HeavyMetalSuizid]

So at the end of Week 1, the game indicates that ErikaRed (AmRose) is short of her points goal and that we can transfer her some of our points. That we can either not transfer her any at all, 10, 25, or all of our points. How many points is she short though? Would 10 points be enough for her to reach her goal or what? Does the game indicate one way or the other regarding this?

She uses a Gold Star, and tells the MC such at the beginning of week two.
I transferred her all my surplus anyways, it's not difficult to reach any goals that are set out, and it's better than having to see, suffer through and shed tears at the horrible exchange rate of 5 to 1.
Clean slate and all.

 

[Game Lord]

She uses a Gold Star, and tells the MC such at the beginning of week two.
I transferred her all my surplus anyways, it's not difficult to reach any goals that are set out, and it's better than having to see, suffer through and shed tears at the horrible exchange rate of 5 to 1.
Clean slate and all.

Yeah, I initially did that same thing and gave her all my overage points as well but I wish there was some type of character points love tracking system in the game indicating where we stand with each of the individual characters. That doing so here with AmRose would move our needle on the scale, so to speak, in a more favorable way with her by our doing this. So that at the end of each week we could see where we stand with each character based on the interactions and decisions we had with all of them.

 

[Kionashi]

what I mean is that its too much to create a pure-NTR route when the whole game from start is a fuck-feast for the MC, that is a typical harem-setting. to add NTR week 3 is very strange. that is why I wrote that it should be light stuff to not shock people.
also, I usually enjoy corruption/ntr game but this was bad and not working at all.

what is the point of adding NTR early on? if you don't have an emotional bond with the cheating partner it would just a scene with a bitch having sex with a random guy... Im not an NTR fan but I guess the main appeal of NTR is the emotional shock of finding someone you care being unfaithful. If you don't have enough time to "care" about that person it would be just another sex scene.

 

[Yonymaster]

Hello, I have a question regarding the difference between the version of the week 3 v2.4.6, and the version of the week 3 v2.2.24 extended, do both have the same content, and the difference in the week 3 v2.2.24 EXTENDED are only additional scenes, animations and sound? I am asking because the V2.4.6 version ends with seeing Lydia looking at the monitors and MC drinks in the bar, and the version V2.2.24 Extended much earlier when we masturbate and turn in a chair with Amber-Rose, or it is good or maybe I missed something, I will add that in EXTENDED version I launched a new game.

 

[Kionashi]

Hello, I have a question regarding the difference between the version of the week 3 v2.4.6, and the version of the week 3 v2.2.24 extended, do both have the same content, and the difference in the week 3 v2.2.24 EXTENDED are only additional scenes, animations and sound? I am asking because the V2.4.6 version ends with seeing Lydia looking at the monitors and MC drinks in the bar, and the version V2.2.24 Extended much earlier when we masturbate and turn in a chair with Amber-Rose, or it is good or maybe I missed something, I will add that in EXTENDED version I launched a new game.

coward !