Ren'Py With Hermione [v0.3.3.0.alpha] [Kirill Repin Art]

[Weird forest Witcher]

Jeah I imagine Luna a Harley Quinn type with real freaky voice and Ginny a loving wife sensual voice. It will probably take a lot of work, so jeah we can wait. This will be amazing, I understand it takes time, can only respect all the details and stuff in this so far. Jeah, all these witches are goinhg to sound so good, dev could take some of the voice art with a picture and it would be a very high quality asmr porn audio. Pornhub has some of these, just some Ai voice and a sexy picture. But this is alredy a lot better. So jeah I am also looking forward for Luna. Crazy girls are so hot. As soon as she is in this I will use this game every day for "stress relief"

 

[Kirill Repin Art]

This week ‘

You must be registered to see the links

’ are getting the access to the ‘With_Hermione-0.3.2_Alpha_dev_03’.
New main menu art for the upcoming public release

 

[baka]

it looks unreal. magical. really nice. Hermione is super cute and hot.
looking forward to try the public-release. will give a detailed feedback.

 

[el eyaculador]

This week ‘

You must be registered to see the links

’ are getting the access to the ‘With_Hermione-0.3.2_Alpha_dev_03’.
New main menu art for the upcoming public release
View attachment 3619267

Even Voldemort was very happy to see his great work.

 

[Jimwalrus]

That new menu art is looking amazing!

I can also vouch for the quality of the upcoming new version - really excellent.

Apologies for making a request Kirill Repin Art, but could you please create a new signature for F95 based on the latest version, to coincide with the public release?
I've made a piss-poor attempt (as you can see in my sig block), but it would be good to have something that didn't look like it was thrown together in five minutes on MSPaint...
Thank you.

 

[Kirill Repin Art]

That new menu art is looking amazing!

I can also vouch for the quality of the upcoming new version - really excellent.

Apologies for making a request Kirill Repin Art, but could you please create a new signature for F95 based on the latest version, to coincide with the public release?
I've made a piss-poor attempt (as you can see in my sig block), but it would be good to have something that didn't look like it was thrown together in five minutes on MSPaint...
Thank you.

Here they are:

 

[exloladdict]

This week ‘

You must be registered to see the links

’ are getting the access to the ‘With_Hermione-0.3.2_Alpha_dev_03’.
New main menu art for the upcoming public release
View attachment 3619267

That video is going to be taken down from Youtube.

 

[Ratnedalu]

That video is going to be taken down from Youtube.

Surprised it isn't already e.e
Sexual Content, Deepfake, and copyrighted music (even heavily remixed)

 

[Weird forest Witcher]

Surprised it isn't already e.e
Sexual Content, Deepfake, and copyrighted music (even heavily remixed)

Youtube should stop beeing prude. For real. You can not fight porn. The internet is 90 % porn

 

[Kirill Repin Art]

Youtube should stop beeing prude. For real. You can not fight porn. The internet is 90 % porn

We'll see but I don't think it'll block my videos.
1. Stellarblade is on Youtube
2. It's not a deep fake, it's an artistic depiction. Parody if you will.
3. I wrote the music myself, so it can't possibly be copyrighted. I did an homage to 'Hedwig's theme' in the second part of the track, but again, I had to write everything from scratch. It's a cover at maximum, nothing 'remixed' about it.

 

[pigg]

There's all sorts of questionable stuff on YouTube... That gay porn music video was up for like a year before attracting media coverage and it was removed.

The game trailer should be fine unless it gets attention from the wrong kind of people.

 

[Ratnedalu]

We'll see but I don't think it'll block my videos.
1. Stellarblade is on Youtube
2. It's not a deep fake, it's an artistic depiction. Parody if you will.
3. I wrote the music myself, so it can't possibly be copyrighted. I did an homage to 'Hedwig's theme' in the second part of the track, but again, I had to write everything from scratch. It's a cover at maximum, nothing 'remixed' about it.

1. Fair enough. Though artstyle differences and differences in tone could be an argument.
2. It's in a realistic/semi-realistic style depicting a real actress, so yes, it is a deepfake. I'm not disparaging you or deepfakes, just telling you what YouTube might say. What anyone outside this thread/forum/site might say.
3. Yeah, I was talking about the Hedwig's Theme part, and you're right, it's removed enough from the original to be fine unless, as Pigg says, someone reports it. But again, see #2; that'd be someone outside the forum most likely and unlike some other sites we don't get a lot of white knights messing stuff up.

 

[baka]

u need to lookup what deepfake means. this is NOT that.
the music/ambient sound can be very similar without problems. its when its a obvious copy that it can call for c@pyshit.
also wtf is wrong with people? all butthurt? why do u care?

 

[Kirill Repin Art]

1. Fair enough. Though artstyle differences and differences in tone could be an argument.
2. It's in a realistic/semi-realistic style depicting a real actress, so yes, it is a deepfake. I'm not disparaging you or deepfakes, just telling you what YouTube might say. What anyone outside this thread/forum/site might say.
3. Yeah, I was talking about the Hedwig's Theme part, and you're right, it's removed enough from the original to be fine unless, as Pigg says, someone reports it. But again, see #2; that'd be someone outside the forum most likely and unlike some other sites we don't get a lot of white knights messing stuff up.

Wikipedia isn’t a good source for a lot of things, but I think it works here:

Deepfakes are synthetic media that have been digitally manipulated to replace one person's likeness convincingly with that of another.

I just don’t think, that things that I do, can be called that. It’s more of a portrait or fan art type of thing.
The real issue is obviously characters and names, but it is what it is.
When you upload the video to YouTube, it automatically checks for copyrighted music, before you even post it. It tries to find actual tracks that were used, I assume it has a giant database. Obviously my track isn’t there, so it got a pass.
Also, there are 13 subscribers on that channel and the idea that somebody would want to report it is very amusing to me.
To be honest, I don’t particularly care about that, it just seemed like a cool thing to do - to post game updates on a YouTube channel, much more convenient to sent links.

 

[Ratnedalu]

Wikipedia isn’t a good source for a lot of things, but I think it works here:

I just don’t think, that things that I do, can be called that. It’s more of a portrait or fan art type of thing.
The real issue is obviously characters and names, but it is what it is.
Also, there are 13 subscribers on that channel and the idea that somebody would want report it seems very amusing to me.
To be honest, I don’t particularly care about that, it just seemed like a cool thing to do - to post game updates on a YouTube channel, much more convenient to sent links.

Oh, I agree, and again I'm not trying to disparage you or anything, I'm just saying be careful. But yes, as per the whole hullabaloo a few months ago about AI-generated Taylor Swift deepfakes, this counts as deepfaking. And personally I have no problem with deepfakes, I think they have their place (and that anyone of higher celebrity has always been sexualized by the populace and this is nothing new, quite frankly; I dare say they should suck it up)

 

[baka]

this is not deepfake. stop with this BS.
deepfake is when u "digitally" alter a source with someone else. like merging a celebrity in a pornstar body.
usually we use the term deepfake to make people believe its real. like placing a politician on another person and let him say something bad, kind of desinformation.
this is high quality rendering. surely she looks good and almost real.

 

[Kirill Repin Art]

this is not deepfake. stop with this BS.
deepfake is when u "digitally" alter a source with someone else. like merging a celebrity in a pornstar body.
usually we use the term deepfake to make people believe its real. like placing a politician on another person and let him say something bad, kind of desinformation.
this is high quality rendering. surely she looks good and almost real.

This is my understanding also, but I can see how someone can make an argument for the opposite. It’ll get technical really quick, but it as far as I’m concerned- it’s just an artwork that is clearly not real.
I don’t think that there’s anybody who would think, that this is a real Emma Watson in a photo shoot with fake boobs, but I suppose I might be wrong. It all would depend on what definition do you use.

 

[Erebus69]

The youtube infraction system is predominately based on the user based report/abuse system. Which has been automated by many different 3rd party IP detection systems. YT internal detection responds differently based on monetization, region, view count, prohibited key words appearing in the closed caption text, automated audio signature comparison to music signature libraries.

 

[Ratnedalu]

this is not deepfake. stop with this BS.
deepfake is when u "digitally" alter a source with someone else. like merging a celebrity in a pornstar body.
usually we use the term deepfake to make people believe its real. like placing a politician on another person and let him say something bad, kind of desinformation.
this is high quality rendering. surely she looks good and almost real.

You're thinking of "Photoshop". And there is no need to get hostile.

 

[Ratnedalu]

This is my understanding also, but I can see how someone can make an argument for the opposite. It’ll get technical really quick, but it as far as I’m concerned- it’s just an artwork that is clearly not real.
I don’t think that there’s anybody who would think, that this is a real Emma Watson in a photo shoot with fake boobs, but I suppose I might be wrong. It all would depend on what definition do you use.

This. This is how I feel about it. It is deepfake: It is the very definition of deepfake, using AI to alter or build from scratch anything that looks like real person. Does that matter? Maybe. Should it? Honestly, probably not. You guys (mostly the gentleman cursing at me) are getting hostile, and I am not trying to be; I'm just telling you that it is deepfake, and due to the issues about that in the wider internet, that is the most likely reason YouTube wouldn't like that.

I, personally, don't care. Like the last gentleman unintentionally alluded to, deepfake is really just the next generation of photoshop. It's nothing for anyone to get up in arms about. I'm just saying, these days people do.